Redrawing the world map: Cosmetic fix or true accuracy?

For more than 400 years, the global view of geography has been quietly distorted by a 16th-century map projection.
Designed for navigation, it drastically misrepresents the actual sizes of the world’s continents.
On Sept. 4, however, the UN General Assembly voted to challenge this long-standing visual convention.
With 164 countries voting in favour, one against, and six abstentions, the UN adopted a landmark resolution that calls for phasing out the classic Mercator projection in official, educational, and public contexts.
Also, it voted in favour of equal-area map projections that accurately represent the true physical dimensions of Africa and the Global-South.
Spearheaded by Togo on behalf of the African Union and backed by a broad coalition of civil society groups, supporters say the decision marks a pivotal moment.
Robert Dussey, Togo’s Foreign Minister, said: “For over four centuries, the world has viewed Africa through a distorted lens that diminished our physical footprint.
“This resolution is not merely about geometry; it is about dignity, historical accuracy, and ensuring that our youth see their continent as it truly exists.”
Tunde Familokun, a supporter of the resolution who termed to old map as “psychological colonialism”, said the resolution marked a victory for accuracy.
“The unanimous vote is a victory for accurate decisions in global diplomacy, educational reform, and cultural advocacy, because it confronts what scholars and diplomats have long described as cartographic psychological colonialism.”
To understand the necessity of the UN resolution requires a return to 1569, when Flemish cartographer Gerardus Mercator introduced his revolutionary world map.
An analysis of media content shows that Mercator created his projection primarily for maritime navigation.
He was said to keep lines of latitude and longitude at straight right angles so that sailors could plot straight-line compass bearings across long oceanic voyages.
However, flattening a spherical planet onto a two-dimensional plane requires mathematical trade-offs, and Mercator’s design distorts relative scale as landmasses stretch farther from the Equator toward the poles.
Put in plain terms, the map was deliberately designed (although inaccurately) for ease of navigation.
The implication under this inaccurate traditional Mercator grid, for instance, is that Greenland appears roughly equal in surface area to the entire continent of Africa.
However, in geographic reality, Africa covers approximately 30.3 million square kilometers, whereas Greenland covers 2.16 million square kilometers, making the African landmass roughly fourteen times larger.
Similar visual compression affects equatorial regions across South America, South Asia, and the Caribbean, while expanding the visual footprint of European and North American landmasses.
As European nations expanded global trade networks and formal education systems over subsequent centuries, Mercator’s specialised nautical chart gradually transformed into the default world map for classrooms, news broadcasts, atlases and digital applications.
In recent years, momentum to challenge this convention organised around the global #CorrectTheMap campaign.
Championed by pan-African advocacy platforms such as Africa No Filter and Speak Up Africa, civil society groups argued that maps are not neutral geometric diagrams but active tools that shape cultural perception.
Advocates emphasised that when generations of children grow up seeing their home continent visually diminished, it subtly reinforces geopolitical biases and underestimates the continent’s demographic weight, environmental stewardship, and economic resource scale.
The diplomatic push finally culminated at the UN General Assembly, where Robert Dussey formally introduced the draft resolution on behalf of AU member states.
The resulting vote reflected strong global alignment, with 164 member states voting in favour, the U.S. casting the single opposing vote, and six nations: Estonia, Georgia, Lithuania, Moldova, Serbia, and Ukraine, abstaining.
It is important to note that, as a General Assembly resolution, the measure functions as a non-binding policy recommendation rather than an absolute prohibition.
Experts say it does not ban Mercator-based nautical or aviation systems where directional angle accuracy remains essential.
Rather, the initiative encourages member states, textbook publishers, software developers, and international media organisations to adopt equal-area map templates for general public reference, classroom instruction and diplomatic documents.
Familokun provided further insights.
“The principal model endorsed by the UN resolution is the Equal Earth projection, developed in 2018 by cartographers Bojan Šavrič, Tom Patterson, and Bernhard Jenny.
“It was specifically to overcome the visual distortions of older cartographic systems, as the Equal Earth projection maintains accurate proportional land sizes across all continents.
“It also preserves natural continental shapes, avoiding the severe vertical stretching associated with earlier equal-area models like the Gall-Peters projection,” he said.
Reactions across the African continent were swift and celebratory, with political leaders and diplomats framing the vote as a vital milestone in historical reconciliation and spatial equity.
Representatives from the AU observed that presenting true geographical proportions reinforces regional development frameworks like Agenda 2063.
They said it would strengthen local self-reliance and encourage balanced international partnerships.
In fact, following the adoption, Togo announced plans to immediately incorporate Equal Earth wall maps and updated geography curricula into its national school system.
Civil society organisations that spearheaded campaign mobilisation also celebrated the resolution as a major milestone.
Representatives from Africa No Filter highlighted that altering the visual baseline of world geography plays an essential role in shifting broader international narratives surrounding Africa.
They also said the move would ensure future generations evaluate the continent based on physical reality rather than cartographic habit.
Educational cartographers commended the choice of the Equal Earth projection, noting its ability to balance mathematical area accuracy with clear visual aesthetics suitable for modern classrooms.
Conversely, the proceedings leading to the adoption of the resolution reflected distinct views regarding international governance and cartographic standards.
Delegations that abstained or opposed the measure voiced concerns regarding the precedent of an international political body endorsing specific map formats.
They maintained that textbook selection, educational software guidelines and cartographic choices should remain within national domestic jurisdictions.
Some professional geographic organisations also noted that classroom instruction should ideally teach students how to analyse different map projections critically rather than treating any single flat rendering as absolute perfection.
They said every flat map projection, whether Equal Earth or the Mercator grid, must compromise between area, shape, distance or direction.
There are also some opposers of the resolution who believe that Africa should focus more on the issues that matter to the continent, rather than how it’s being projected on a map.
Joy Ameh, a civil society worker, asked what it mattered whether the continent is the biggest or smallest.
We are the poorest continent and come last in every development index, yet our concern is about a map?” he queried.
The practical implications of the resolution are expected to unfold across education, media, and digital technology over the coming years.
Educational ministries throughout Africa and supporting nations are preparing revised textbook publishing standards to ensure classroom atlases and wall maps reflect equal-area proportions.
Also, tech developers and software engineers face growing interest from educational institutions and public agencies to offer equal-area defaults across digital mapping applications.
For neutrals, replacing a centuries-old navigational habit with accurate proportional representation ensures that future generations will view Africa and the world through a clearer, more balanced lens. (NANFeatures)
(function(){try{var u=”https:\/\/nannews.com.ng\/wp-json\/nan\/v2\/track\/pageurl”,p=896269;if(navigator.sendBeacon){var d=new FormData();d.append(“pid”,p);d.append(“url”,location.href);navigator.sendBeacon(u,d);}else{var x=new XMLHttpRequest();x.open(“POST”,u,true);x.setRequestHeader(“Content-Type”,”application/x-www-form-urlencoded”);x.send(“pid=”+p+”&url=”+encodeURIComponent(location.href));}}catch(e){}})();



