Implications of politicisation of the police, judiciary by FG: A stitch in time saves nine

By Idris Salisu Rogo
Any government, including Bola Tinubu’s administration, can politicise the Nigeria Police Force and judiciary, which can have significant implications for Nigeria’s rule of law, governance, and civil society.
*Here are some potential implications:
1. Erosion of trust:
When law enforcement and judicial institutions are perceived as politically biased, public trust in these institutions diminishes. Citizens may become reluctant to report crimes or seek justice, fearing that the system is rigged in favour of those in power.
2. Rule of law undermined:
A politicised police force and judiciary can lead to selective law enforcement, where certain individuals or groups are protected while others are targeted. This undermines the principle of equality before the law and can lead to a culture of impunity.
3. Increased human rights violations:
Politicisation may result in the police being used as tools for political repression, leading to increased human rights abuses, including unlawful arrests, torture, and extrajudicial killings. This can stifle dissent and suppress opposition voices.
4. Judicial independence compromised:
If political considerations influence the judiciary, its independence is compromised. This can lead to biased rulings, a lack of accountability for government actions, and a failure to uphold constitutional rights.
5. Political instability:
Using state security apparatus against political opponents can increase tensions and conflicts, potentially resulting in political instability. This may manifest in protests, civil unrest, or even violent confrontations.
6. Impact on governance:
A politicised police force may prioritise political loyalty over professional standards, leading to inefficiencies and corruption within the police. This can hinder effective law enforcement and public safety, affecting overall governance.
7. International relations and reputation:
The perception of a politicised judiciary and police can damage Nigeria’s international reputation, affecting foreign relations, investment, and aid. International organisations may criticise the government, and Nigeria may face sanctions or reduced support.
8. Civil society response: Civil society organisations may mobilise in response to perceived injustices, leading to increased activism and advocacy for reforms. This can create a more vibrant civil society but may also lead to confrontations with the state.
9. Long-term institutional damage: Over time, the politicisation of these institutions can lead to a culture of corruption and inefficiency that is difficult to reverse. Rebuilding trust and integrity in the police and judiciary may take generations.
10. Public disillusionment: As citizens witness the erosion of justice and accountability, there may be widespread disillusionment with the political process, leading to apathy or radicalisation among population segments.
In summary, the politicisation of the Nigerian police force and judiciary can have far-reaching consequences that affect not only the legal and political landscape but also the social fabric of the country. Any government must uphold the independence of these institutions to ensure a fair and just society.
Idris Salisu Rogo, PhD, writes from the Department of Education, Bayero University, Kano, via- rogoidris@gmail.com



